2/20/2023 0 Comments Dignity one lop![]() ![]() ![]() The National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), for example, complained that the bill is "unnecessary because newborn infants already receive full legal protection." As we shall see, however, some doctors and judges have denied that legal rights from birth apply to newborns who survive attempted abortions. Wade and it allegedly misled the public regarding current abortion law and practice. ![]() Supporters of unrestricted abortion gave three reasons for opposing the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act: it was "unnecessary" it contradicted Roe v. As Professor Hadley Arkes of Amherst anticipated when he conceived this bill over a decade ago, organized pro-abortion groups could not sit by silently while Congress recognized the full humanity of prematurely born children even outside the womb. Put simply, the Act provides – for the purpose of federal law – that the words "person," "human being," "child," and "individual" shall include "every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development." The measure also codifies the definition of "born alive" found in the laws of most states – evidence of heartbeat, respiration, and/or voluntary movements after the infant's complete expulsion from the mother.įrom its simplicity and from the nearly unanimous votes in Congress one might conclude that no one could oppose it, but that assumption would be wrong. The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act became law on August 5 at a signing ceremony in Pittsburgh, to which President Bush invited both nurse Jill Stanek, who shocked the country with her eye-witness account of live-birth abortions in a suburban Chicago hospital, and Gianna Jensen, who survived a saline abortion. The Senate agreed to the bill by unanimous consent on July 18, 2002. Reintroduced in the 107th Congress, the measure (now H.R. Later, attached as a rider to the Patients' Bill of Rights, the pro-life bill passed the Senate 98-0, but it died with that legislation. Tom Daschle (D-SD) allowed a pro-life measure to reach the Senate floor for a vote!Ī seemingly modest bill, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act was first introduced in July 2000 and passed the House two months later on a lop-sided vote of 380-15, only to be killed in the Senate by an anonymous objection to a request for unanimous consent. Possible item of interest to "Ripley's Believe It or Not": For the first time since becoming Senate Majority Leader in May 2001, Sen. 3 July-August 2002 Congress Delivers Born-Alive Infants Protection Act ![]() Life Insight- A Publication of the NCCB Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |